Tags
Hmm. Despite the inevitable new years resolution to eat more healthfully I appear to have been trying a lot of new chocolate lately!
Fabulous Fingers
I had gotten from somewhere the incorrect idea that the new fabulous fingers were GIANT fingers. I think it comes from the packaging above, where they’ve zoomed right into the finger on the right so you can see the layers. So when I bought these (for a £1 at Asda, the RRP is £1.99), I was mightily disappointed that they were regular old finger sized – indeed they seem stubbier than normal fingers.
However they are very tasty indeed with the two layers of chocolate adding up to a moreish mouthful (ooh alliteration!). I would buy these again if I was going over to someones house and needed something to munch on, but only at the bargainous £1 price and not at any more than that – its just not very good value for money at the full RRP at all.
Twirl Bites
I loooooove the little mini twirls that you get in boxes of Cadbury Heros. They’re amazing. So Twirl Bites were always going to be something I loved as clearly I love the original twirl. I didn’t love them as much as I thought though, for a couple of reasons.
Firstly, they look NOTHING like the picture on the bag and nothing like the mini Twirls in heros. I suspect, although it may just be a ridiculous conspiracy theory, that the proliferation of kit kat bites, twirl bites and all the other bites about at the moment are as a result of the fact that its a cost effective way to turn the offcuts of producing the bar into a marketable product. They’ve taken something that would probably have been consigned to the bin before and are now selling them. Check out how the Twirl Bites actually look –
Not very appetizing is it? Whats more the bites are all jagged and misshapen and lumpy, I don’t know if its scientific or psychological but they don’t actually taste as good as the little Twirls from heros!
Twirl Bites are £2.03 RRP with frequent BOGOF offers on them, and I got mine for £1.29 from Home & Bargains. I wouldn’t buy them again 😦
Chunkie Caramel cookies
Sorry for the small picture – it was the best I could find on the web!
This new caramel version of Fox’s chunkie chocolate-chip chocolate-covered cupcakes is similar to the other versions (chocolate chip, white chocolate chip and chocolate chup – coated) which are AWESOME. There is no better complement to a cup of tea than one of those bad boys. These new biscuits seem to be the same as the usual milk chocolate version, but with added caramel flavouring. If I’d thought about it for a second I probably wouldn’t have grabbed these off the shelf as I don’t enjoy the taste of artificial caramel flavouring at all. I’m not sure anyone does? I was expecting some kind of liquid caramel element as with Fox’s AMAZING millionaire’s shortcake biscuits. So these biscuits aren’t for me and I wouldn’t be buying them again but Fox’s are still my favourite biscuits overall!
Related articles
- Review : Cadbury Flake Allure & Cadbury choc chip cookies (kerrycooks.wordpress.com)
- Review : New Fox’s Ambers biscuits (kerrycooks.wordpress.com)
- Best Store-Bought Chocolate Chip Cookies (thedailymeal.com)
Lindsey said:
Cadbury’s Fabulous Fingers are really really good but horribly expensive at RRP, that is over 12 pence for each finger! They are also thoroughly over packaged: you can fit all 16 into half the box. I object to being conned by big boxes containing small amounts! Shame on you Cadbury/Burton’s Biscuits!
kerrycooks said:
Excellent point Lindsey – I never even thought about that at the time!
Susannah Bianchi said:
You’re killing this model Miss Kerry. I may have to trade in my carrot sticks and yogurt for a Cadbury Bar.
Yum.
S
kerrycooks said:
Oh dear. If my blog is responsible for the end of your modelling career I promise you can come to England and live with me!
Oldcat said:
Even if they were smoother to start with, the big-bag packaging could lead to them getting rumpled in transit as they bang together. But I’m sure you are right is that the bytes let them recover some of the ‘broken’ normal pieces and sell them.
I noticed this years ago about Oreo cookies (chocolate sandwich cookies with white filling). The company brought out a box of them covered with mint chocolate, and in nibbling the mint off I noticed that a lot of the cookies had one of the outer cookie layers flipped upside down. I thought it was clever to sell rejects as premium items.
kerrycooks said:
Yeah I thought that too – they’ve definitely been rubbing up against each other in the bag. Ahh very interesting insight about the Oreos! I wonder what other products are disguised rejects….
Oldcat said:
Well, Breadcrumbs in a bag come to mind at once…
kerrycooks said:
*gasps* my mind is blown
Kate said:
Next time you get cadbury’s fingers, bite the end of each end and suck tea through the middle. YOUR MIND WILL BE BLOWN!
kerrycooks said:
Holy cow I never knew this was possible! They have a FUNCTION! As a delicious straw? Amazing!